« “Froggies” v. “les Rosbifs” | Main | Open Spaces and the Arabian Gulf »

22/09/2008

Comments

Tolmie Wachter

Mr. Gates' is on target regarding his observation that Sarah Palin's story resonates with the American psyche. In a country accustomed to the recognition of success based upon individual merit rather than class and pedigree, it is not so much of a surprise to see someone advance from heading the local PTA to governing the state. It is amusing to watch the reaction of the EU to such manifestations of the American values of strong faith, individual responsibility and limited government. Regarding Mrs. Palin's ability to assume the mantle power as vice president, and being a "heartbeat away" from the presidency, at least she has demonstrated executive experience and competency beyond that of her present competition. Southwest Airlines became successful in adopting a hiring credo that selected workforce candidates based upon attitude and competency, saying that "you could train to the rest". As VP, like any executive, Mrs. Palin would have access to a tremendous pool of expertise from which to glean analysis. From that point she relies on sound judgment, the most important qualification.
Despite the continuing trend toward globalization, nations seem to stubbornly hold on to their cultural proclivities. The nomination of relative newcomer Sarah Palin demonstrates a refreshing rebuke to political entrenchment and elitism. This is the same appeal (also never understood by Europeans) that Ronald Reagan offered in the 1980s. We look forward to this opportunity to hold off the trend of creeping socialist utopianism evidenced by environmental fanaticism, moral relativism and the silencing effects of political correctness as long as possible. Always appreciative of your organization and its blog.
--TEW

Mr. Chou

what triggers me is that in America these days stopped selling the whole "land of freedom" concept, instead a new "land of opportunity" idea was introduced by the presidential candidates such as Obama. I mean America is in need of diversity tolerance on the political level. Sarah Palin and Obama are just some of the examples.

But what if U.S. can't maintain its supermacy in the next decade, will these people be the scapegoat for blaming? Anglo-saxon dominated societies still have this white-male centered belief. It was not the first places in the world for implementing gender equality on the political level(remember it is a Small nordic country) nor abolition of slavery: absurdly it was France the first one in 1780.

I am not quite sure if the American mainstream (in the long run)are able to accept the fact that these minorities are taking over...

Cultural values are hard to be changed within a single historical era. Research shows it remains almost intact even within three generations.

The comments to this entry are closed.

BBC News